Enterprise Architecture to Support the Resolution of IT Governance Problems in Regional Banks
Abstract
Digital transformation in the banking sector requires organizations to establish information technology governance that can align business strategy, processes, data, applications, and organizational structures. Bank XYZ, as a regional development bank, faces three main IT governance problems: application portfolio inefficiency, weak data governance, and limited organizational alignment. This study aims to analyze how the development of Enterprise Architecture (EA) can support the resolution of these three problems. This research applies a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were collected through documentation studies of strategic documents, governance documents, application catalogues, data catalogues, as well as discussions and assessments involving business and IT units of Bank XYZ. The analysis was conducted by mapping the identified problems to relevant EA artifacts, evaluating their suitability using COBIT 2019 APO03 Managed Enterprise Architecture, and confirming the analysis results with relevant stakeholders. The findings show that EA supports the improvement of application portfolio inefficiency through the application landscape and application communication diagram, which provide visibility into application distribution, functions, and inter-system dependencies. In terms of data governance, the data architecture and data catalogue help clarify data domains, data definitions, and the relationship between data, business processes, applications, and organizational units. For organizational alignment, the cascading of EA artifacts from the metamodel to level 2 business processes and the demonstration of the Event Driven Process Chain show how processes, data, applications, and organizational units can be integrated within a single architectural framework. The APO03 evaluation indicates a capability score of 2.70, meaning that EA management has passed Capability Level 2 but has not yet reached Capability Level 3. Stakeholder confirmation also indicates that the EA artifacts are considered suitable and relevant to the organization’s needs, particularly in addressing the three IT governance problems. However, stakeholders expressed concerns regarding implementation, especially in ensuring that EA artifacts can be managed, updated, and used continuously. These findings indicate that EA can serve as an IT governance analysis instrument that helps organizations understand architectural complexity and determine improvement priorities more systematically. Therefore, Bank XYZ needs to strengthen its EA management policy, establish a RACI matrix, and develop an EA implementation plan integrated with organizational program and project governance.
References
G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
P. Kane, Gerald C. Doug, “Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation,” MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press Date: 2015. [Online]. Available: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/strategy-drives-digital-transformation/
H. Baig, Aamer Brian, “Flipping the Odds of Digital Transformation Success,” Boston Consulting Group, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/increasing-odds-of-success-in-digital-transformation
H. Alghamdi, “Assessing the Impact of Enterprise Architecture on Digital Transformation Success: A Global Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 20, p. 8865, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16208865.
Saragih, Juli Panglima, “Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pembangunan Daerah dalam Konteks Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Publik,” J. BPPK, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–70, 2017.
F. P. Rachman, E. Indrajid, and E. Dazki, “ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR BANKING IN THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ERA 4.0,” JHSS J. Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 142–148, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33751/jhss.v6i2.5394.
S. Sentosa, R. E. Indrajit, and E. Dazki, “Enterprise Architecture of the Basic Banking Feature for a New Challenger of Digital Banking in Indonesia,” sinkron, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2197–2211, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.14116.
S. De Haes and W. Van Grembergen, Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Alignment and Value, Featuring COBIT 5. in Management for Professionals. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14547-1.
ISACA, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. ISACA, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit
W. Ross, Jeanne W. Peter, Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Enterprise_Architecture_as_Strategy.html?id=ng3AbVQlEncC
Y. Gong and M. Janssen, “The value of and myths about enterprise architecture,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 46, pp. 1–9, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006.
F. Saleem and B. Fakieh, “Enterprise Architecture and Organizational Benefits: A Case Study,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 8237, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12198237.
T. Tamm, P. B. Seddon, G. Shanks, and P. Reynolds, “How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations?,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, 2011, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02810.
Creswell, John W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4uB76IC_pOQC
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1543971
H. Miles, Matthew B. A. Michael, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ
The Open Group, The TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition. San Francisco: The Open Group, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.opengroup.org/togaf-standard-10th-edition-downloads













