Mapping the Abstract: How Conceptual Metaphors Architect Lampungese Social Realities

  • Redika Cindra Reranta Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Nurul Hidayah Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Irvan Pramudia Universitas Lampung
Keywords: conceptual metaphor, Lampungese, cognitive linguistics

Abstract

Modern cognitive linguistics acknowledges metaphors as essential cognitive processes that influence human cognition; however, their manifestation in indigenous Austronesian languages remains significantly underexamined. This study seeks to address this gap by examining the social, relational, and emotional dimensions of the Lampung language (Lampungese) through conceptual metaphors. A qualitative research design was employed grounded in Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), utilizing a meticulous triangulation of naturalistic observation, in-depth interviews with twenty native speakers, and natural social experiments within traditional Lampungese enclaves. The analysis indicates that the meaning-making process of quotidian Lampungese predominantly relies on orientational and structural metaphors. The application of orientational mappings to systematically arrange spatial relations, such as face-to-face proximity (lawan) and linearity, serves as a metric for assessing cooperative dynamics and emotional resilience, devoid of the intrinsic competitiveness present in related languages. Simultaneously, structural metaphors facilitate the articulation of abstract cultural realities via tangible physical concepts. It transforms the physical aspects of family life (inggoman) into emotional experiences, everyday labour into sacred rituals of tradition (begawi), and the proportional into the divine (bagian). This study concludes that the daily vocabulary of the Lampungese is not merely a collection of arbitrary linguistic signs but rather the result of intricate and profoundly rooted cultural logic. The findings present substantial empirical evidence for the cultural specificity of CMT, contest superficial literal misinterpretations of the indigenous lexicon, and furnish profound insight into how the Lampungese community cognitively constructs a social reality characterised by harmony, fulfilment, and divine order.

References

Aloairdhi, N. M., & Kahlaoui, N. (2020). Linguistic, cognitive, and psycholinguistic perspectives on metaphor. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(9), 1078–1085.
Cui, X., & Li, Y. (2023). A comparative study of Russian and Chinese liver metaphors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(6), 1421–1428.
Doquin de Saint Preux, A., & Masid Blanco, O. (2021). The power of conceptual metaphors in the age of pandemic: The influence of the WAR and SPORT domains on emotions and thoughts. Language and Communication, 81, 37-47.
James, A., Songden, R. J., Lagan, B. S., & Ojo, O. (2023). Syntactic Metaphors as Common Features of Most Nigerian Indigenous Names. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 5(4), 1–12.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lesur, M., Longo, M. R., & Tajadura Jiménez, A. (2025). Linking spatial metaphors to body size perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 127, 103762.
Magaña, D. (2026). Metaphors in cancer care: Cultural insights from Spanish and Mexican physician–patient interactions. Journal of Language and Health Communication, 18(1), 45–63.
Mannoni, M. (2021). Rights Metaphors Across Hybrid Legal Languages, Such as Euro English and Legal Chinese. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34, 1375–1399.
Mulyadi, M. (2013). Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Serta Pemikiran Dasar Menggabungkannya. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 15(1), 127-136.
Paramita, S., & Sadtyadi, H. (2021). The Metaphor of Craving in the Tanha Vagga of the Dhammapada Scripture (Semantic Study of Buddhist Texts). Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 6(2), 129–140.
Reranta, R. C. (2023). Lampungnese Politeness Strategy. Teknosastik, 21(2), 110-121.
Reranta, R. C. (2024). Lampungnese Anger Intonation. Teknosastik, 22(1), 64-74.
Reranta, R. C. (2025). Lampungese Lexicalized Onomatopoeia. Teknosastik. 24(1), 14-21
Reranta, R. C., & Laksman-Huntley, M. (2022). Acoustic Parameters Giving the Angry Impression in Lampungnese Neutral Speech. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(1), 49-61.
Reranta, R. C., & Putri, E. H. R. (2023). Lampungnese Connotative Meaning. Teknosastik, 21(1), 35-41.
Safira, T. P., & Reranta, R. C. (2025). Bangkan Malayan Phatic Expression. Teknosastik, 23(1), 35-42.
Sargsyan, N. (2023). The essence of metaphor and its interlingual translation. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 19(1), 105–117.
Sherris, A. (2021). Re-thinking Everyday Metaphors Through Indigenous Ghanaian languages: Shifting the Center to the Margins. Sociolinguistic Studies, 15(1), 7–15.
Zaluchu, S. E. (2020). Strategi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di dalam Penelitian Agama. Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, 4(1), 28-38.
Published
2026-07-30
How to Cite
Reranta, R. C., Hidayah, N., & Pramudia, I. (2026). Mapping the Abstract: How Conceptual Metaphors Architect Lampungese Social Realities. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 24(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.33365/teknosastik.v24i2.2386