Decision Support System for New Employee Admission Selection Using a Combination of LOPCOW and MARCOS

Imron Imron; Eka Rini Yulia; Andriansah Andriansah; Sefrika Sefrika

doi:10.33365/jatika.v6i1.9

Imron Imron Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Eka Rini Yulia Universitas Nusa Mandiri
Andriansah Andriansah Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Sefrika Sefrika Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jatika.v6i1.9

Keywords: Combination, Decision Making, LOPCOW, MARCOS, Selection

Abstract

The selection of new hires is an important process in human resource management to ensure that the organization gets the individuals who best suit the company's needs and goals. The main problem in the selection of new employee admissions is often related to the difficulty of achieving objectivity and fairness in the assessment process. Reliance on subjective assessment, lack of structured selection methods or absence of valid and reliable measurement tools can result in inaccurate decisions. The ranking results in the selection of new employee admissions show the value generated from each candidate, Candidate AE is ranked first with the highest score of 24.48, followed by Candidate DS with a score of 22.95. JE Candidate was ranked third with a score of 21.36, followed by FY Candidate with a score of 21.3. These results reflect the performance of each candidate in meeting the selection criteria that have been determined. This research contributes to improving accuracy and fairness in selection decision-making, by reducing subjectivity bias in weighting and ranking candidates. With transparent and measurable results, this research helps companies in systematically selecting the best candidates, while improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the recruitment process. The combination of the LOPCOW and MARCOS methods offers the flexibility to be applied in a variety of selection contexts, not only in employee admissions, but also in other multi-criteria decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Korucuk, A. Aytekin, F. Ecer, Ç. Karamaşa, and E. K. Zavadskas, “Assessing Green Approaches and Digital Marketing Strategies for Twin Transition via Fermatean Fuzzy SWARA-COPRAS,” Axioms, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 709, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/axioms11120709.

A. Lia Hananto, B. Priyatna, A. Fauzi, A. Yuniar Rahman, Y. Pangestika, and Tukino, “Analysis of the Best Employee Selection Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1908, no. 1, p. 012023, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1908/1/012023.

M. Gheibi et al., “A Sustainable Decision Support System for Drinking Water Systems: Resiliency Improvement against Cyanide Contamination,” Infrastructures, vol. 7, no. 7, p. 88, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures7070088.

O. Kabadurmus, Y. Kayikci, S. Demir, and B. Koc, “A data-driven decision support system with smart packaging in grocery store supply chains during outbreaks,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 85, p. 101417, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101417.

J.-S. Lin and K.-H. Chen, “A novel decision support system based on computational intelligence and machine learning: Towards zero-defect manufacturing in injection molding,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 40, p. 100621, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2024.100621.

S. S. Hosseini Dehshiri and B. Firoozabadi, “A new application of measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) in solar site location for electricity and hydrogen production: A case study in the southern climate of Iran,” Energy, vol. 261, p. 125376, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125376.

M. Bitarafan, K. A. Hosseini, and S. H. Zolfani, “Identification and assessment of man-made threats to cities using integrated Grey BWM- Grey MARCOS method,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 581–599, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.31181/dmame622023747.

S. H. Hadad, A. R Metha, S. Setiawansyah, and H. Sulistiani, “Evaluation of Salesperson Performance in the Sales Allowance Decision Support System Using the MARCOS and PIPRECIA Methods,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 477–486, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i2.4863.

S. Chakraborty, P. Chatterjee, and P. P. Das, “Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method,” in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Manufacturing Environments, Apple Academic Press, 2024, pp. 297–307.

A. Abdulla, G. Baryannis, and I. Badi, “An integrated machine learning and MARCOS method for supplier evaluation and selection,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 9, p. 100342, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100342.

Z. Guo et al., “An integrated MCDM model with enhanced decision support in transport safety using machine learning optimization,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 301, p. 112286, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112286.

Ö. Işık, M. Shabir, and S. Moslem, “A hybrid MCDM framework for assessing urban competitiveness: A case study of European cities,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 96, p. 102109, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102109.

T. Van Dua, D. Van Duc, N. C. Bao, and D. D. Trung, “Integration of objective weighting methods for criteria and MCDM methods: application in material selection,” EUREKA Phys. Eng., no. 2, pp. 131–148, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003171.

A. Ulutaş, F. Balo, and A. Topal, “Identifying the Most Efficient Natural Fibre for Common Commercial Building Insulation Materials with an Integrated PSI, MEREC, LOPCOW and MCRAT Model,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 6, p. 1500, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15061500.

S. Dhruva, R. Krishankumar, E. K. Zavadskas, K. S. Ravichandran, and A. H. Gandomi, “Selection of Suitable Cloud Vendors for Health Centre: A Personalized Decision Framework with Fermatean Fuzzy Set, LOPCOW, and CoCoSo,” Informatica, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 65–98, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.15388/23-INFOR537.

L. K. Singh, M. Khanna, and R. Singh, “Artificial intelligence based medical decision support system for early and accurate breast cancer prediction,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 175, p. 103338, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103338.

M. Naiseh, D. Al-Thani, N. Jiang, and R. Ali, “How the different explanation classes impact trust calibration: The case of clinical decision support systems,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 169, p. 102941, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102941.

Sumanto et al., “Improved LOPCOW-SAW Method for Optimal Supplier Selection in Supply Chain Management,” in 2024 12th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2024, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/CITSM64103.2024.10775429.

V. Simic, S. Dabic-Miletic, E. B. Tirkolaee, Ž. Stević, A. Ala, and A. Amirteimoori, “Neutrosophic LOPCOW-ARAS model for prioritizing industry 4.0-based material handling technologies in smart and sustainable warehouse management systems,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 143, p. 110400, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110400.

A. Mitra, “Cotton fibre selection based on quality value using measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method,” Res. J. Text. Appar., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 299–316, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1108/RJTA-03-2022-0030.

Ö. F. Görçün and G. Doğan, “Mobile crane selection in project logistics operations using Best and Worst Method (BWM) and fuzzy Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS),” Autom. Constr., vol. 147, p. 104729, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104729.