- Focus and Scope
- Authors Guidelines
- Peer Review Process
- Open Access Policy
- Publication Ethics
- Plagiarism Screening
- Copyright & License
- Editorial Team
- Reviewer Team
- Author Fees
- Publication Frequency
- Journal History
- Allegations of Research Misconduct
- Conflict of Interest
- Post-Publication Discussion
- Correction and Retraction
- Review Process Policy
- Ownership and Management Information
- Archiving Policy
- Manuscript Type
- Generative AI Policy
- Authorship & Contributorship

Peer Review Process
Every manuscript submitted to JATIKA (Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak) undergoes a rigorous editorial and peer-review process to ensure originality, scientific quality, methodological soundness, and relevance to the journal's scope. JATIKA applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system, in which both authors' and reviewers' identities remain anonymous throughout the review process.
Review Model
| Review Type | Double-Blind Peer Review |
| Number of Reviewers | Minimum of two independent reviewers |
| Review Duration | Approximately 4–8 weeks |
| Revision Period | Maximum 6 weeks after revision request |
Peer Review Workflow
The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for focus and scope, structural formatting, language quality, and ethical compliance. Plagiarism screening is conducted using Turnitin, requiring a similarity index of a maximum of 20% for the manuscript to proceed to peer review.
Suitable manuscripts are assigned anonymously to at least two expert reviewers under the Double-Blind Peer Review policy.
Reviewers evaluate originality, methodology, technical quality, novelty, references, ethical issues, discussion, conclusions, and overall contribution.
Reviewer comments are returned to the corresponding author. Authors are requested to revise the manuscript and submit a response to reviewers.
Based on reviewers' recommendations and editorial evaluation, the manuscript will receive one of the following decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Accepted manuscripts undergo a final similarity re-check using Turnitin (max 20%) before publication.
Review Criteria
- Originality and novelty of the research.
- Relevance to the journal's focus and scope.
- Scientific contribution and significance.
- Methodological validity and technical quality.
- Quality of discussion and conclusions.
- Language clarity and manuscript organization.
- Reference quality and citation accuracy.
- Publication ethics and Turnitin plagiarism compliance (Max 20%).
Editorial Policy
The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject manuscripts during the initial screening if they fall outside JATIKA's scope, fail to meet ethical or formatting requirements, exceed the 20% Turnitin similarity threshold, or do not demonstrate sufficient scientific quality. The Editor-in-Chief's decision regarding publication is final.

