Digital BIPA instruction at KBRI Washington, DC: challenges and strategies for beginner learners

Nurhayani Pandia; Kristiawan Indriyanto; Dian Syahfitri

doi:10.33365/jeltl.v6i2.2772

Nurhayani Pandia Universitas Prima Indonesia
Kristiawan Indriyanto Universitas Prima Indonesia
Dian Syahfitri Universitas Prima Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v6i2.2772

Keywords: BIPA, CIPP evaluation, Digital language learning, Indonesian for foreign speakers, online instruction

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital language education has made Indonesian language instruction more accessible to foreign speakers. However, there is still little research on how digital BIPA (Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing) programs work in diplomatic settings. This study examines the challenges and teaching strategies used in digital BIPA classes at the Indonesian Embassy in Washington, DC, with a focus on beginner learners. Using Stufflebeam's CIPP evaluation model, the research takes a qualitative case study approach with two instructors and twenty-six learners in adolescent and adult beginner classes. Data was collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews, and surveys using Google Forms. The results show several key challenges: a 12-hour time difference that requires early-morning classes, Zoom's technical limitations that make learning and speaking practice more difficult, and weekend scheduling conflicts that affect attendance. Learners found speaking skills the hardest to develop, while vocabulary and grammar were easier to learn online. Instructors responded with adaptive strategies, such as using English to support adolescents and full Indonesian immersion for adults, along with gamification, repetition, and making the most of platform features. The study finds that successful digital BIPA programs need careful planning to address these challenges, teaching methods tailored to different learners, and focused support for speaking skills in online classes. These insights offer practical guidance for language program designers, teachers, and policymakers working to expand Indonesian language instruction through digital platforms.

References

Al Imron, Y. (2022). Implementasi algoritma Fisher Yates Shuffle untuk pengacakan soal dan jawaban pada aplikasi pengenalan materi pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi penutur asing (BIPA) [Unpublished manuscript].

Anggaira, A. S. (2023). Indonesian language learning assistance for foreign speakers (BIPA) at the Indonesian Embassy in Ankara, Turkey. International Journal of Community Engagement Payungi, 3(1), 11–19. https://journal.payungi.org/index.php/ijcep/article/view/34

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Faizin, Isnaini, M., & Khoiriyah. (2025). The innovation in Indonesian language for foreign speaker teaching: A systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(7), Article 2026331. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026331

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Kiely, R., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2005). Program evaluation in language education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford University Press.

Nasution, J. (2020). Analisis kesulitan pemelajar Bahasa Indonesia bagi penutur asing (BIPA) di Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages (SamSIFL), Uzbekistan pada 4 keterampilan (skills) berbahasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Aquinas, 3(1), 27–40.

Nasution, J. (2022). Methods of teaching foreign languages – Innovations, traditions, problems and solutions. In Conference Proceedings (pp. 90–96). Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages.

Pahleviannur, M. R., De Grave, A., Saputra, D. N., Mardianto, D., Hafrida, L., Bano, V. O., Susanto, E. E., Mahardhani, A. J., Alam, M. D. S., & Lisya, M. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Pradina Pustaka.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Safitri, F., Ramlah, R., Sandy, W., & Siregar, A. C. (2025). Literasi digital dalam dunia pendidikan. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Siswanto, R. (2022). Pemanfaatan teknologi digital Google Form sebagai daftar hadir dan sekaligus mencetak sertifikat pada kegiatan webinar Direktorat PPG. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi, 3(1), 45–52.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press.

Suardana, I. P. O., & Numertayasa, I. W. (2021). Analisis perilaku verbal dan nonverbal guru dalam pembelajaran daring di SDN 21 Dangin Puri: Studi kasus pembelajaran selama COVID-19. Jurnal Elementary: Kajian Teori dan Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 42–48.

Sudaryanto. (2016). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.

Syahfitri, D., Indriyanto, K., & Arianto. (2025). Digitalizing Si Bontar Mudar Folktale As Teaching Material for Indonesian Language for Foreign Speakers (Bipa) – Beginner Level. Ezikov Svyat (Orbis Linguarum), 23(ezs.swu.v.23.3), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.37708/ezs.swu.bg.v23i3.11

Umar, H. (2013). Metode penelitian untuk skripsi dan tesis bisnis (2nd ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Utama, I. D. G. B. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran visual bagi pebelajar BIPA pemula di Undiksha. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 9(2), 112–121.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.