ENGLISH PROFICIENCY MATRICULATION MODULE REJUVENATION BASED ON CRITICAL DIGITAL PEDAGOGY

Mohammad Fikri Nugraha Kholid; Mohammad Ridho  Kholid

doi:10.33365/jeltl.v6i1.366

Mohammad Fikri Nugraha Kholid UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Mohammad Ridho Kholid UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v6i1.366

Abstrak

The English proficiency matriculation program is a mandatory requirement for all new students at UIN Raden Intan Lampung. This program aims to equip students with foundational English knowledge and skills. However, both the modules and the teaching process have thus far been conducted in a conventional, monotonous manner, with limited innovative developments introduced. Therefore, this study seeks to develop an English matriculation module based on critical digital pedagogy a technology-based module that emphasizes not only mastery of basic English language skills but also cultivates students' critical awareness of the importance of English in today's technological era. This research employs a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The participants in this study are first-semester students from the English Education program at UIN Raden Intan Lampung. Each stage of the module development will be tested to evaluate its efficiency, effectiveness, and quality standards. This critical digital pedagogy-based English matriculation module is expected to serve as an alternative approach that aligns with the current digitalization trends within Islamic State Universities.

Referensi

Bandura, Albert. (1976). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Baroud, J., & Dharamshi, P. (2020). A Collaborative Self Study of Critical Digital Pedagogies in Teacher Education. Studying Teacher Education, 16(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1739639

Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., & Lohner, G. (2022). Negative Impacts From the Shift to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Crisis: Evidence From a Statewide Community College System. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221081220

Brega, O. N., & Kruglyakova, G. V. (2022). Students’ readiness to online English language self-learning module and approaches to its integration into the educational process. Perspectives of Science and Education, 57(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.3.17

Brown, D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.

Coker, H. (2020). Why Does Digital Learning Matter? Digital Competencies, Social Justice and Critical Pedagogy in Initial Teacher Education. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v14i1.6259

Collier, A., & Watulak, S. L. (2023). Critical Digital Pedagogy in Higher Education (S. Köseoğlu, G. Veletsianos, & C. Rowell, Eds.). Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781778290015.01

Combs, Arthur. (2006). Being and Becoming: A Field Approach to Psychology. Springer Publishing Company. .

Griliches, Z. (2009). R and D, Education, and Productivity. Harvard University Press.

Hidalgo-Camacho, C., Escudero, G. I., Villacís, W., & Varela, K. (2021). The Effects of Online Learning on EFL Students’ Academic Achievement during Coronavirus Disease Pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1867–1879. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1867

Kwon, H. R., & Silva, E. A. (2020). Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219881135

Lunevich, L. (2021). Critical Digital Pedagogy and Innovative Model, Revisiting Plato and Kant: An Environmental Approach to Teaching in the Digital Era. Creative Education, 12(09), 2011–2024. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.129154

Masood, M. M., & Haque, Md. M. (2021). From critical pedagogy to critical digital pedagogy: a prospective model for the EFL classrooms. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 1(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-03-2021-0005

Ministry of Religious Affairs. (2022, June 11). Lagi, Lima IAIN Telah Bertransformasi Menjadi UIN. 2022.

Mitasari, Z., Istikomayanti, Y., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Pembelajaran Daring di Perguruan Tinggi: Persepsi dan Faktor Penentu. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 12(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v12i1.3757

Motallebzadeh, K., Ahmadi, F., & Hosseinnia, M. (2018). Relationship between 21st Century Skills, Speaking and Writing Skills: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11319a

Muzammil, Moh., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). “Investigating Student Satisfaction in Online Learning: The Role of Student Interaction and Engagement in Distance Learning University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928

Roinah, R. (2019). Problematika dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di STAIN Bengkalis. QUALITY, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v7i1.4966

Salmiah, M., & Fitriyani, F. (2022). The University Students’ Anxiety in Learning English Grammar. English Education : English Journal for Teaching and Learning, 10(01), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.24952/ee.v10i01.5658

Sardar, Z., & Henzell-Thomas, J. (2018). Rethinking Reform in Higher Education. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Spence, P., & Brandao, R. (2020). Critical Digital Pedagogies in Modern Languages – a Tutorial Collection. Modern Languages Open, 38, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo.v0i0.343

Su, C., & Guo, Y. (2021). Factors impacting university students’ online learning experiences during the COVID 19 epidemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1578–1590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12555

Suprayogo, I. (2006). Paradigma Pengembangan Keilmuan Islam Perspektif UIN Malang. UIN Maliki Press.

Thorndike, E. (1898). Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals. The Macmillan Company.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Material Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Traxler, J., & Crompton, H. (2020). Critical Mobile Pedagogy: Cases of Digital Technologies and Learners at the Margins (1st ed.). Routledge.

UIN Raden Intan Lampung. (2019). Pedoman Akademik Program Sarjana. UIN Raden Intan Lampung press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wei, H.-C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Education, 41(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768

Yaseen, H., Alsoud, A. R., Nofal, M., Abdeljaber, O., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2021). The Effects of Online Learning on Students’ Performance: A Comparison Between UK and Jordan Universities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(20), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i20.24131

Yousof, S., Eid Alsawat, R., Ali Almajed, J., Abdulaziz Alkhamesi, A. A. A., Mane Alsuhaimi, R., Abdulrhman Alssed, S., & Mohamad Wahby Salem, I. M. W. S. (2021). Impacts of Prolonged Online Learning Practice during COVID-19 Epidemic on Body Functions and Wellbeing: A Review Article. Journal of Medical Science, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.20883/medical.e522

Zeng, S. (2018). English Learning in the Digital Age: Agency, Technology and Context. Springer Singapore.