ANALISIS KOMPARATIF KINERJA RF-DETR DAN YOLOV11 UNTUK DETEKSI DAN KLASIFIKASI KUALITAS CABAI
Abstract
Increasing demands for the quality and consistency of horticultural commodities highlight the limitations of manual
sorting methods, which tend to be subjective and inefficient. This study aims to develop and evaluate an automated
system for detecting and classifying chili pepper quality using a deep learning-based computer vision approach. Two
state-of-the-art object detection models, namely YOLOv11 and RF-DETR, were implemented and compared using a
dataset of chili pepper images classified into fresh, unripe, and damaged categories. The research methodology
employed a quantitative experimental approach encompassing data collection, instance segmentation annotation,
preprocessing, model training, and performance evaluation. The results show that both models demonstrate good
detection capabilities, with YOLOv11 excelling in inference speed, making it suitable for real-time applications, while
RF-DETR exhibits higher detection accuracy and stability under complex visual conditions. These findings indicate
a balance between computational efficiency and detection accuracy. This research contributes to the development of
computer vision-based automated systems to improve the efficiency and objectivity of the agricultural product grading
process.
References
(Capsicum annuum L.) Using Digital Image Processing,” Int. J. Agric. Environ. Sci., vol. 6, no.
4, pp. 17–23, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.14445/23942568/IJAES-V6I4P104.
[2] M. Bhattarai and J. Mariyono, “The economic aspects of chilli production in Central Java,”
Econ. J. Emerg. Mark., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 85–97, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.20885/ejem.vol8.iss2.art1.
[3] A. A. Abdul Manan, M. A. Mohd Razman, I. Mohd Khairuddin, and M. N. A. Shapiee, “Chili
Plant Classification using Transfer Learning models through Object Detection,”
MEKATRONIKA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 23–27, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.15282/mekatronika.v2i2.6743.
[4] N. Carion, F. Massa, G. Synnaeve, N. Usunier, A. Kirillov, and S. Zagoruyko, “End-to-End
Object Detection with Transformers,” May 28, 2020, arXiv: arXiv:2005.12872. doi:
10.48550/arXiv.2005.12872.
[5] R. Sapkota et al., “YOLO advances to its genesis: a decadal and comprehensive review of the
You Only Look Once (YOLO) series,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 58, no. 9, p. 274, Jun. 2025, doi:
10.1007/s10462-025-11253-3.
[6] M. Anwar, Y. Kristian, and E. Setyati, “Klasifikasi Penyakit Tanaman Cabai Rawit Dilengkapi
Dengan Segmentasi Citra Daun dan Buah Menggunakan Yolo v7,” INTECOMS J. Inf. Technol.
Comput. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 540–548, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.31539/intecoms.v6i1.6071.
[7] Sudianto, Y. Herdiyeni, A. Haristu, and M. Hardhienata, “Chilli Quality Classification using
Deep Learning,” in 2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Its Application in
Agriculture (ICOSICA), Bogor, Indonesia: IEEE, Sep. 2020, pp. 1–5. doi:
10.1109/ICOSICA49951.2020.9243176.
[8] H. Zhu and X. Xie, “Enhanced YOLOv11n for small object detection in UAV imagery: higher
accuracy with fewer parameters,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 5536, Jan. 2026, doi:
10.1038/s41598-026-35301-2.
[9] I. Robinson, P. Robicheaux, M. Popov, D. Ramanan, and N. Peri, “RF-DETR: Neural
Architecture Search for Real-Time Detection Transformers,” 2025, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2511.09554.
[10] A. Lukas et al., “Fresh Chili Agribusiness: Opportunities and Problems in Indonesia,” in
Sustainable Development, vol. 16, O. Özçatalbaş, Ed., IntechOpen, 2024. doi:
10.5772/intechopen.112786.









