Microlearning Effectiveness in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Student Retention and Learning Outcomes

  • Muhammad Jainuri Universitas Merangin
  • Kamid Kamid
  • Syaiful Syaiful
  • Nizlel Huda
Keywords: microlearning, higher education, student retention, learning outcomes, systematic review, meta-analysis, educational technology, digital pedagogy

Abstract

The proliferation of digital technologies in higher education has necessitated innovative pedagogical approaches to enhance student retention and learning outcomes. Microlearning, characterized by short, focused learning segments, has emerged as a promising strategy for addressing contemporary educational challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of microlearning interventions in higher education settings, specifically examining their impact on student retention rates and learning outcomes from 2020-2025. Following PRISMA guidelines, we comprehensively searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and IEEE Xplore. Studies were included if they examined microlearning interventions in higher education contexts with quantitative measures of student retention or learning outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Of 2,847 initially identified studies, 42 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 15,673 participants across 18 countries. Meta-analysis revealed significant positive effects of microlearning on student retention (pooled OR = 1,87; 95% CI: 1,45-2,41; p < 0,001) and learning outcomes (standardized mean difference = 0,74; 95% CI: 0,58-0,90; p < 0,001). Subgroup analyses indicated greater effectiveness in STEM subjects when combined with mobile technologies. Heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 67% for retention, I² = 71% for learning outcomes). Microlearning significantly positively affects student retention and learning outcomes in higher education. The evidence supports its implementation as an effective pedagogical strategy, particularly in statistics education and technology-enhanced learning environments. Future research should focus on long-term retention effects and optimal design principles.

References

ALIAS, N. F., & Abdul Razak, R. (2023). EXPLORING THE PEDAGOGICAL ASPECTS OF MICROLEARNING IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.3

Bego, C. R., Lyle, K. B., Ralston, P. A. S., Immekus, J. C., Chastain, R. J., Haynes, L. D., Hoyt, L. K., Pigg, R. M., Rabin, S. D., Scobee, M. W., & Starr, T. L. (2024). Single-paper meta-analyses of the effects of spaced retrieval practice in nine introductory STEM courses: is the glass half full or half empty? International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00468-5

Buchem, I., & Hamelmann, H. (2010). Microlearning : a strategy for ongoing professional development Microcontent and Microlearning. ELearning Papers, 21(September 2010), 1–15. openeducationeuropa.eu/en/download/file/fid/19530

Ebbinghaus, H. (2013). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. In Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (Vol. 20, Issue 4). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10011-000

Giurgiu, L. (2020). Microlearning an evolving elearning trend. Scientific Bulletin of the Polytechnic University of Timisoara. Transactions on Engineering and Management, 3(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35219/teem.2020.1.03

Gobierno de Nueva, G. del S. (2017). Cognitive load theory: Research that teachers really need to understand. Centre for Education Stratistics and Evaluation, August, 12. https://education.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/main-education/about-us/educational-data/cese/2017-cognitive-load-theory.pdf

Gonçalves, G. S., Serra, F. A. R., Storopoli, J. E., Scafuto, I. C., & Rafael, D. N. (2024). Undergraduate Student Retention Activities: Challenges and Research Agenda. Sage Open, 14(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249334

Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McGuinness, L., McDonald, S., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., Moher, D., Glanville, J., Chou, R., Brennan, S. E., Boutron, I., Akl, E., … Tetzlaff, J. M. (2021). Pravila PRISMA 2020. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903

Karl M. Kapp, R. A. D. (2019). Microlearning: Short and Sweet. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Microlearning.html?id=Uiy-DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Kristiana, I. F., Prihatsanti, U., Simanjuntak, E., & Widayanti, C. G. (2023). Online Student Engagement: The Overview of HE in Indonesia. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(3), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.7125

Matz, S. C., Bukow, C. S., Peters, H., Deacons, C., Dinu, A., & Stachl, C. (2023). Using machine learning to predict student retention from socio-demographic characteristics and app-based engagement metrics. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32484-w

Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., Apong, R. A., & Mahmud, M. M. (2024). Investigating Learners’ Perceptions of Microlearning: Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes. IEEE Access, 12, 178251–178266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3472113

Nikou, S., & Maslov, I. (2021). An analysis of students’ perspectives on e-learning participation – the case of COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2020-0220

Ortiz-Martínez, G., Vázquez-Villegas, P., Ruiz-Cantisani, M. I., Delgado-Fabián, M., Conejo-Márquez, D. A., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2023). Analysis of the retention of women in higher education STEM programs. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01588-z

Røe, Y., Wojniusz, S., & Bjerke, A. H. (2022). The Digital Transformation of Higher Education Teaching: Four Pedagogical Prescriptions to Move Active Learning Pedagogy Forward. Frontiers in Education, 6(January), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.784701

Sathiyaseelan, B., Mathew, J., & Nair, S. (2024). Microlearning and Learning Performance in Higher Education: A Post-Test Control Group Study. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.752

Senandheera, V. V., Muthukumarana, C. K., Ediriweera, D. S., & Rupasinghe, T. P. (2024). Impact of microlearning on academic performance of students in higher education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Multidisciplinary & Translational Research, 9(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.4038/jmtr.v9i1.2

Shatte, A. B. R., Teague, S. J., & Shatte, A. (2019). Microlearning for improved student outcomes in higher education: A scoping review. Osf.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory (J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (eds.); Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Tinto, V. (2017). Reflections on Student Persistence. Student Success, 8(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.376

Wang, C., Bakhet, M., Roberts, D., Gnani, S., & El-Osta, A. (2020). The efficacy of microlearning in improving self-care capability: a systematic review of the literature. Public Health, 186, 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.007

Wang, T., Towey, D., Ng, R. Y., & Gill, A. S. (2021). Towards Post-pandemic Transformative Teaching and Learning. SN Computer Science, 2(4), 271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00663-z

Published
2025-07-24
Section
Articles